Indeed, in this case, the negative aspects of both extremes, together, create a kind of socio-economic "bomb" and the positive aspects of both extreme strategies can not fully develop, restrained its opposite. What do you do? Instead normalize the price of certain assets, or try to market methods to get away from the economic crisis generated by the same market methods, you must go to the level of normalization algorithms determine the value of assets. Perhaps at the moment it is difficult to imagine that Parliament did not vote for the "Law on the budget," but for "the Law on algorithm for calculating the budget. " However, this is the level of economic regulation, which, at the same time allows you to save market relations and prevent crises like the current one. Exit impasse that has arisen in the logic of the subject is always in the game logic. Game as a design technology for collective action in a crisis business, in particular, recommends Mark Fuller, head of the consulting company of world renown Monitor Group and co-author John Beck in his book "Revival of the economy Samurai" / / Moscow, Publishing House "Good Book" in 2007 – 288. Generally speaking, it is possible to live in crisis, and can be played in the crisis.
AND those who play in a crisis (such as stock brokers) are now forming their capital. This occurs at the very moment when people living in crisis, losing assets. "For the crisis (more to the game in Crisis) is the most prepared state Kitay.Ono and out of the crisis, if not the winner, then with a minimum of losses.